FTC declares non-compete agreements invalid

The FTC ruling declaring non-compete agreements unenforceable may have a significant impact on trade secret litigation cases. Non-compete agreements are often used by companies to protect their trade secrets and other confidential information from being shared with competitors by former employees. However, if these agreements are not enforceable, it may make it more difficult for companies to prevent their trade secrets from being disclosed.

Without the threat of enforcement through non-compete agreements, companies may need to rely on other means to protect their trade secrets, such as implementing strong confidentiality agreements, restricting access to sensitive information, and implementing technological safeguards. Additionally, companies may need to be more vigilant in monitoring and detecting potential breaches of trade secret protection.

In trade secret litigation cases, the absence of enforceable non-compete agreements may make it harder for companies to demonstrate that their trade secrets were misappropriated by former employees who have joined a competitor. Companies may need to rely on other evidence, such as forensic analysis of electronic devices, witness testimony, and documentary evidence to prove their trade secret claims.

Overall, the FTC ruling on non-compete agreements may lead to increased complexity and uncertainty in trade secret litigation cases, as companies seek alternative means to protect their valuable intellectual property.

Contact a California Trade Secret Law Firm

Vondran Legal® has litigated hundreds of state and federal law IP cases since our founding in 2004. Call us to discuss your case at (877) 276-5084 or email us through our contact form.